What Are Source, Form, And Redaction Criticism - 1940 Words

WEEK 2 TEXTBOOK QUESTIONS Pg. 110 1.) What are source, form, and redaction criticism? Source, form, and redaction criticism are scientific methods used in interpreting the texts of the Bible. They are methodological steps on a path to seeking the origin and provenance of the Biblical texts from about 1900 to 1975 (). 2.) How does each method work? Form criticism puts its focus on the period of oral tradition and sees the Bible as a collection of traditional stories and sayings which were spread from word of mouth and eventually preserved in writing. Source criticism is the quest for the earliest sources which lie behind a given biblical text. Redaction criticism is a study of the collection, orchestration, editing, and modification of Biblical sources, often used to recreate the community and purposes of the authors at that time. 3.) From an evangelical perspective, what are the strengths and weaknesses of each? Scholars use form criticism to deny Scripture and the form-critics have a bias against supernaturalism and believe that the miracles of Jesus were created. The German scholar Rudolf Bultmann believed that the Bible needed to be stripped of its miraculous accounts, and be â€Å"demythologized† in order to be accepted by modern society. A strength of form criticism that I see is the amount of proven accuracy that the Jewish scribes put in to writing their texts. The Old Testament text and the Dead Sea Scrolls were practically identical even though they wereShow MoreRelatedThe Synoptic Problem Essay1861 Words   |  8 Pages These resemblances and variations in the Gospels form the â€Å"Synoptic Problem†. The Synoptic problem is not a problem at all but is a method of looking at the similarities and differences between the gospels. In this paper the Synoptic Problem will be addressed from three different angles: form criticism, source criticism, redaction criticism and literary criticism. [1] Form Criticism Form criticism is a method of textual criticism, applied especially to the Bible, for tracing the originRead MoreThe Historical Critical Method Of Bible Interpretation1749 Words   |  7 Pagesthat the historical-critical method creates an environment of doubt and confusion. I will evaluate and review two articles that pertain to this subject, The Historical-Critical Method of Bible Interpretation written by Seigert W. Becker and Higher Criticism and the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America written by Richard A. Krause. In addition, I will analyze Timothy Ward’s book Words of Life and Dr. Francis Martin’s contribution to Carl, Scott ed. Verbum Domini and the Complimentarity of ExegesisRead MoreThe Doctrine Of The New Testament929 Words   |  4 Pagesâ€Å"As with Old Testament work, redaction accepts the principles and necessity of Source criticism and recognizes the importance stressed by Form critics of the oral period in which traditions about Jesus passed on in the church. However, it rejects the description of the synoptic gospels as mere collections and fragments (Oxford biblical studies).† That said, the synoptic gospels appear to be all on one accord in referenceRead MoreEssay on The Historical Critical Method2026 Words   |  9 PagesThe New Testament is now well over 1900 years old and for nearly the same period of time people have struggled for the right interpretation of that what was written in these 27 books and letters. How should one handle a book that is Gods Word? Before looking at the pro and contra of historical-critical exegesis it is necessary to define this method. One of the many textbooks teaching the historical-critical method Methodenlehre zum Neuen Testament by Wilhelm Egger method gives us this definitionRead MoreExegesis Paper : The Lord s Prayer1917 Words   |  8 Pagesher room and close the door to pray, which will allow the Father to hear them pray and He will reward it (Matthew 6:6). Matthew also states that one should not use a bunch of meaningless words to pray, such as the pagans do. The Father already knows what one needs, before he even prays for it, which infers that long and elaborate prayers are not necessary to try and impress God (Matthew 6:7-8). Following this passage, Matthew states that a disciple must forgive others of the wrongs that have beenRead MoreThe Origin Of The Torah1614 Words   |  7 PagesTorah, also known as the Pentateuch, meaning ‘instruction’, and is part of the Hebrew Bible, including the following five books: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy. The Documentary Hypothesis questions the authority of the author and source of the Torah. The Documentary Hypothesis is also known as the Julius Wellhausen proposition. This theory essentially proposes the notion that the Torah was actually derived from at least four independent, original narratives that, when combined, makeRead MoreLiterary Criticism of Exegesis on Matthew 16: 13-19 A2553 Words   |  10 Pages Description: Exegesis on Matthew 16: 13-19 A. Literary Criticism Context. What follows and precedes your passage? Is your passage affected by this context? Matthew 16: 13-19 is where Jesus explains to the disciples for the first time that he is really the Messiah, which they had not known before, while Matthew had made his readers aware of the fact in the first chapter. Peter receives this knowledge as a revelation from God, which is why Jesus blesses him and commissions him as the new highRead MoreEssay on Encountering the Old Testament2615 Words   |  11 PagesTestament was an exciting theological and historical journey. (All Bible references in this paper come from the New King James Version of the Bible, except where clearly noted by the student). Chapter 1: What Is the Old Testament and Why Do We Study It? Canon: What is the Bible? The Bible is a collection of sixty six books; thirty nine in the Old Testament and twenty seven in the New Testament. But there are some sacred works that are not included in the Bible and the questions ofRead MoreThe Bible Is No Different1898 Words   |  8 Pagesworld often collaborate to create timeless pieces of art; the Bible is no different. The Documentary Hypothesis proposes this same ideology of the Bible. Past scholars have devoted countless years determining the origin or sacred text. This particular source critique aims to understand the theory of multiple authors and publications to comprise the Pentateuch, Torah, or Old Testament. In Recent Scholarship on the Pentateuch, some scholars struggle with the methodological question concerning whether theRead MoreThe Gospel According to Matthew Essay2877 Words   |  12 Pagescollector on the margin of the Jewish religion life get such an extensive education, why did an apostle and companion of Jesus not put forward and c laim to be personally involved in the events of Jesus life, why did he rely on Mark and Q as his written sources, rather than this person memory?† If this traditional credit of authorship to Matthew the apostle is rejected, then we must question who this Matthew was. Was he a missionary or was he the Patron to the author. Whatever the reason we have some knowledge